Updated: 7/7/2020 | July 7th, 2020 (Original post 4/28/16)
Years ago, Mississippi and North Carolina passed anti-LGBT laws and lots of tourists, bloggers, and celebrities immediately said, “As a sign of protest, I won’t check out because I don’t want to support a state whose laws I disagree with!”
This reminded me of when people refused to go to Myanmar because of the junta, declined to check out the united states when George Bush was president, or refused to check out Cuba because of Fidel Castro. (There are dozens of examples of people boycotting destinations because of the government’s politics that could be listed.)
While people have the ideal to do whatever they want and take any personal stance they want, I think tourism-based economic protests are a mistake because they hit the wrong target, they aren’t effective, and that travel and human interaction can bring about a lot more and deeper change than a reflective boycott.
Here’s why.
Boycotts hit the wrong People
Governments can and do change: laws are passed and repealed, voters eject politicians and vote in new ones, and revolutions and sanctions topple dictators.
We might not agree with certain laws or a current government, but if traveling abroad and defending the united states during the Bush years has taught me anything, it is that people are not their governments, lumping everyone together is misguided, and you end up hurting the people who you agree with.
In fact, you might even weaken your allies by not showing support.
Like, for example, one of the bookstores I spoke at during my book tour.
This North Carolina store is suffering because authors are canceling the events this place needs in buy to stay in business. small independent bookstores are already suffering and this is just another nail in the coffin for this place. They are collateral damage to a law they do not agree with.
Governments don’t always reflect the will of all their people (or even a majority). but behind boycotts are real people and services who suffer. people struggling to put food on the table and meet payroll. They might not support their government or certain controversial laws yet we lump everyone together as if everyone in the destination is what we despise.
And, in doing so, those we agree with and want to support become collateral damage. We create pain for the people at the bottom, the people with the most to lose and, usually, the least say in things.
And, though the shouts of travel boycotters often add to the pressure on elected officials, I’ve yet to see one country or state reverse course simply because of this reason no matter how strong the plea.
I used to say, “I’m never going to Myanmar because I hate the government” and because I wanted to take a stand.
But, when I started traveling, I found it silly that people said, “I don’t like Bush, so I refuse to go to the United States,” as if this was enough to pressure Bush to change or that we were all die-hard Bushites.
It made me realize that a lot of citizens of Myanmar didn’t choose to live under a military dictatorship any a lot more than I chose Bush as President.
And all my protest was doing was denying people the money they needed to survive and the global perspective that could have added fuel to their desire for change.
They Don’t Do Enough
What caused Myanmar to change, Iran to open up, or South Africa to end apartheid? It wasn’t a drop in vacationer numbers. It was governmental and corporate sanctions on a enormous scale.
Indiana softened its anti-LGBT law when corporations and conferences pulled out en masse. The Apartheid government in South Arica collapsed when governments, major banks, and other corporations stopped doing service with it and loaning it money. Iran finally yielded under the weight of sanctions that drove it toward bankruptcy.
Those changes were a combination of domestic activism and international pressure not travel boycotts.
I think it’s foolish to think that somewhere there’s a government official enjoying reports of vacationer boycotts and declaring, “Tourist numbers are down 10%! We need to change!” If they cared about that, they would have done something different in the first place.
Governments care about big business, tax revenue, and those at the top. When you cause pain there, you cause change.
Travel CAN Bring Change
If you really want to do good, you can’t shut off people from the world — you need to embrace them and show them a better way. The way we affect change is by traveling and educating people about the broader world to change their minds.
Staying home isn’t going to effect change. It simply hurts those who might not have control over their government. travel opens people to new ideas, cultures, and ways of thinking. If you really want to bring about change, go there and kill them with kindness.
I indicate don’t we travel to see the world, learn, and help foster cultural understanding? You can’t do that by staying home. You can only do that by going to the destination.
As Maya Angelou said, “Perhaps travel cannot stop bigotry, but by demonstrating that all peoples cry, laugh, eat, worry, and die, it can introduce the idea that if we try and understand each other, we may even become friends.”
***
I don’t support the laws passed by these two states. I don’t support the Castro regime. I certainly didn’t support Bush.
Nor do I support the current governments in Thailand or Egypt or censorship laws in China.
Do I agree with the treatment of women in lots of Arab countries or Japan’s policy of “forgetting” its genocide in China during WWII? 아니요.
But I believe boycotting travel to countries because of one law or its current choice of leader is misguided. If we were to compile a list of places with one policy or leader that we don’t agree with, we would never go anywhere. There would always be a red line keeping us home.
A lot of boycotts are about signaling who we are as people and what our values are. They signal to our group I believe this and that I am with you.
However, if you really want to change the behavior of your country, lobby local services and your elected to make a change. make sure your money goes to the people that a lot of need it.
If you feel the need to “take a stand”, do so but remember people are not always their current government’s policy. I think it’s much better to engage people on the ground, change opinions, and pressure your own government or companies to take action.
We’ll create bigger change that way than if we just sit at home.
하루에 50 달러에 세상을 여행하는 방법
World Travel에 대한 나의 New York Times 베스트셀러 페이퍼 백 가이드는 여행의 예술을 마스터하는 방법을 보여 주므로 구타 경로를 벗어나 돈을 절약하며 더 깊은 여행 경험을 할 수 있습니다. BBC가“예산 여행자를위한 성경”이라고 불렀던 것은 A ~ Z 계획 가이드입니다.
더 많은 것을 배우고 오늘 읽기 시작하려면 여기를 클릭하십시오!
여행 예약 : 물류 아이디어와 트릭
비행기를 예약하십시오
Skyscanner를 사용하여 저렴한 비행을 찾으십시오. 전 세계 웹 사이트와 항공사를 검색하기 때문에 내가 가장 좋아하는 검색 엔진입니다.
숙박 시설을 예약하십시오
Hostelworld로 호스텔을 예약 할 수 있습니다. 호스텔 이외의 어딘가에 머무르려면 Guesthouses 및 Hotels의 가장 저렴한 요금을 지속적으로 반환하므로 Booking.com을 사용하십시오.
여행 보험을 잊지 마십시오
여행 보험은 질병, 부상, 도난 및 취소에 대해 귀하를 확보합니다. It’s detailed protection in case anything goes wrong. 과거에 많은 시간을 사용해야했기 때문에 나는 여행을하지 않습니다. My favorite companies that offer the best service and value are:
Safetywing (모두에게 최고)
내 여행을 보장하십시오 (70 세 이상의 사람들을 위해)
Medjet (for additional evacuation coverage)
여행을 예약 할 준비가 되셨습니까?
Check out my resource page for the best companies to use when you travel. I list all the ones I use when I travel. They are the best in class and you can’t go wrong using them on your trip.